The bill borrows from Virginia’s land-base casino initiative
South Carolina lawmakers are considering a bill that could bring casino gambling to the state for the first time, allowing up to three casino resorts in select counties. The proposal, called the I-95 Economic and Education Stimulus Act, aims to boost economic development in rural areas, particularly along Interstate 95. If approved, it would authorize casinos in Dillon, Marlboro, and Orangeburg counties, with a major $1 billion project planned for the town of Santee.
Supporters of the bill argue that casino resorts would provide significant job opportunities and revenue for struggling communities. Representative Chris Murphy, who is leading the effort, believes the initiative could transform the region by attracting tourism and creating new employment options for residents. Data from 2023 shows that over 40% of children in Orangeburg County were living below the poverty line, highlighting the economic challenges the area faces.
The Santee casino, proposed by real estate developer Wallace Cheves, would be built on a site currently occupied by an abandoned shopping center. Projections suggest the project could generate around 4,600 jobs and bring in over $75 million in annual tax revenue. Cheves, known for his involvement in casino development, previously helped finance the Catawba Indian Nation’s Two Kings Casino in North Carolina.
Despite the economic benefits outlined by proponents, the bill faces a challenging road ahead. South Carolina has some of the strictest gambling laws in the country, and past efforts to expand gaming have been met with resistance due to religious and social opposition. Legalizing casinos would require a constitutional amendment, which must pass with a two-thirds majority in the legislature and then be approved by voters in a statewide referendum.
While another gambling bill introduced late last year sought to legalize slot machines, table games, and sports betting, it has made little progress. Whether this latest proposal gains traction remains uncertain, but it has reignited the debate over the future of gambling in South Carolina.
